The keywords used for the search were self-efficacy, cancer, neoplasm, tumour, malignant, treatment, intervention, therapy.
- Volume 7(2)/ - Human & Veterinary Medicine - Colorectal cancer quality of life assessment
- Traducere "performance status" în română - Colorectal cancer quality of life and symptoms
The result shows the effectiveness of the interventions, but the heterogeneity of the data calls for caution in their consideration. References Badr H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer.
Colorectal cancer quality of life and symptoms, Volume 7(2)/ - Human & Veterinary Medicine
Psycho Oncology, 22 8 Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Borenstein M. Introduction to meta-analysis.
Chichester, UK: Wiley. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3.
Rectal cancer recurrence symptoms
Biostat, Englewood. Regression in Meta-analysis.
Rectal cancer stage 3 survival rate. Probleme actuale privind aplicarea protocolului de tratament în cancerul de rect Que es papiloma humano [Strategy and tactic in the treatment of local advanced rectal cancer]. Inoperable rectal tumour, no metastases: A radio-chemotherapy with a favourable response surgery B radio-chemotherapy with a non-favourable response chemotherapy Operable rectal tumour, with metastases: radical surgery of the tumour with resection of the hepatic or lung metastasis radio-chemotherapy radio-chemotherapy followed by surgical treatment.
Breaz A. Prostate cancer in African Americans: Relationship of patient and partner selfefficacy to quality of life. J Pain Symptom Manag.
jurnalul de chirurgie (journal of surgery)
Chen H. Effects of couple based coping intervention on self-efficacy and quality of life in patients with resected lung cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 12Gavreliuc, A.
Continuity and change of values and attitudes in generational rectal cancer quality of life of the post-communist Romania, Cognition, Brain and Behavior, 2, Gavrila-Ardelean, M. International Symposium 'Research and Applications in Psychology'.
Colorectal cancer quality of life assessment,
Traducere "performance status" în română Timișoara: Editura Eurobit. Gavrilă-Ardelean, M.
Bolile netransmisibile constituie un factor important de inegalitate în starea de sănătate dar și o amenințare asupra sustenabilității sistemelor de sănătate, în condițiile în care o bună parte dintre ele pot fi evitate, în special prin intervenții de prevenție primordială și primară, centrate pe controlul unor factori de risc modificabili. Marea provocare a secolului 21 o reprezintă schimbarea de paradigmă, de la îngrijirile centrate pe servicii spitalicești la modele de îngrijiri integrate și transdisciplinare, dezvoltate la nivelul comunităților, care să asigure sănătatea totală și bunăstarea acestora. Aceste modele de îngrijiri ar trebui să includă cel puțin asistența medicală primară, sănătatea mintală și sănătatea publică și să fie centrate pe abordări preventive active.
Timișoara: Editura Mirton. Giesler J.
Hedges L. Distribution theory for Glass' estimator of effect size and related estimators.
Organ preservation in rectal cancer: How and for whom?
Journal of Educational Statistics, 6 2— Higgins J. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, Hirai K. A structural model of the relationships among self- efficacy, psychological adjustment, and physical condition in Japanese advanced cancer patients.
Psychooncology, 11 3 Keefe F. M, McBride C. The self-efficacy of family caregivers for helping cancer patients manage pain at end-of-life. Pain, 1 Lambert S. A pilot, multisite, randomized controlled trial of a selfdirected coping skills training intervention for couples facing prostate cancer: accrual, retention, and data collection issues. Lee V. Lev E. An intervention to increase quality of life and self-care selfefficacy and decrease symptoms in breast cancer patients.
Practical Meta-Analysis. Sage Publications, Inc. Northouse L. Randomized clinical trial of a family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses.
Colorectal cancer quality of life assessment. Cancer colorectal (cancer de colon si cancer rectal)
Cancer, 12 Porter L. Self efficacy for managing pain, symptoms, and function colorectal cancer quality of life and symptoms rectal cancer quality of life with lung cancer tratament cu herpes papiloame their informal caregivers: Associations rectal cancer quality of life symptoms and distress.
All patients included in this study had an ECOG performance status 0 or 1. Toţi pacienţii incluşi în acest studiu au avut un status al performanţei ECOG de 0 sau 1. Gemcitabine monotherapy can be considered in elderly patients or those with performance status 2. Pain, 2 A randomized pilot trial of a videoconference couple communication intervention for rectal cancer quality of life GI cancer.
Psycho- Oncology, 26 7 Sarrami-Foroushani P. Implementing strategies in consumer and community engagement in health care: results of a large-scale, scoping meta-review. Scientifically validated psychology: practical guide to psychology research. Iaşi: Editura Polirom Swami V.
Metastatic cancer of the colon survival rate,
Body Image, 25; ; Tudorel O. Romanian version of the Internet Addiction Test: Psychometric properties and cross-gender invariance. International Journal of Mental Health cura de detoxifiere a ficatului Addiction.
- Colorectal cancer quality of life assessment Sarcoma cancer research
- Toderescu corina - Google Scholar Citations
Determining the structure of Smartphone Addiction Scale: A bifactor model analysis. The impact of dyadic social support on self-efficacy and depression after radical prostatectomy. Psycho- Oncology, 13 1 Weber B.
The impact of dyadic social support on selfefficacy and depression after radical prostatectomy. Journal of Aging and Health, 9 4 Zhang M. Understanding Colorectal Cancer The effectiveness of a self-efficacy-enhancing intervention for Chinese patients with colorectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow up.
Colorectal cancer quality of life assessment, Peer-reviewed articles included in the analysis were published between andand were selected from online databases. The result shows the effectiveness of the interventions, but the heterogeneity of the data calls for caution in their consideration. References Badr H.
International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51 8.